Architecture Theory movie WP from Megan Khunakridatikarn on Vimeo.
Contemporary Theory and Ideology
Friday, December 13, 2013
Parametricism
We are now live in the time of post Fordism. It is the
era of people use thing differently. In Fordism period people use everything
the same because it is the age of mass production. Technology back then does
not allow us to have a lot of choices. But now as the new technologies were
invented, people are allowed to choose or even custom made thing. If we talk
about Fordism, we would think of Ford car the model T. In the past the model T
has came out in only two colors. But now people can buy car in any color as
they wish or even has a custom painted car.
Beside the example of something tangible like car,
another example can be found on the virtual, Internet search. In every computer
has it’s own DNA. That DNA is the memory of the usage of each computer. From
the example in the class, Ajarn Taylor searched the word Jordan and let us
searched it as well. He got the result came out to be about Michael Jordan but
many of us got the country Jordan or Air Jordan. Another one is key word that
we searched in class was meaning of life. For me the first thing that I got
after the search is Mormon.org because I have a lot of connection to mormons. But
for others got something like movie or something else. So the technology allow
the market to be more customize according to how the customer wants
Parametricism is a new style for architecture that
derives the form from the parameter of the field. Parameters in every field are
distinctive. Even that the site stay empty but what is never empty is the field
it is why the parameter can be extracted from the field. Every single element
of fenestration may be different sizes according to how we want it to be
according to the parameter and our intention. In addition, because of the
advancement in technology that was stated above, it allowed us to have the
custom made window frame. So the parametric building is design for only one
particular site because it comes from the parameter of the field surround.
Guang Zhou Opera House, Zaha Hadid |
Object
As the last blog, which I talk about system, I stated
that we all have the interaction with others not only organism but also other
objects as well. Object could make us
behave some certain way because our perceptions were frame according to the
usage of the object that we saw.
A door, we all know that it is an architectural object
that meant to be a threshold. All we have to do to walk through it is to push
or to pull to open it. And we all know that it is a responsibility of a person
to close the door that he or she open.
The door that is left open would annoy to other people within the space.
As I stated earlier, the door meant to be a threshold but so is the arches. One
thing that make it different from the arches is it can be close to give the
privacy to people that live inside the space, it can protect those people from
weather, pollution or any unpleasant things. It is our perception that makes us
feels annoy to the fact that the door is left open. From that we hire people to
only open and close the door and these people are doormen. Or we even invent
the sensor that could open the door. People can never satisfy by the object
itself. They always fine the discomfit in the object and develop it to become
even more comfortable to any kind of users.
I’m just thinking of what I have learned so far in
this class. I think this class has greatly impacted on me. I once think that
everything that is visible is real but they are not. As I look back and rethink
of every theory that Ajarn Taylor, object has a strong relationship on how our
perceptions were frame. In post-modern world that we are living in, people do
care about how they look more than who they really are. Moreover, they even use
that as a standard to judge people at first sight. There is no surprise for me
to see that people in my age pick a guy to date by his look rather than his
soul. People care so much about the appearance because it frames their personal
images. In other term, we are trapped under the power of the materialistic.
System
No one can survive in the world alone. No matter how
good that person is, he still needs to interconnect with another living
organism. Because every organism living on this planet is a part of a system
call ecology. It is a big system that one needs another in order to survive.
Nothing is autonomous.
Every matter has its own potential to become something
in community because there is “system” that gives the matter to become
something. System makes the matters become form. There are two ways to look at
the system, which are holistic view and ecological view. To view the object
holistically is to look the system within the object. The example is to look at
a bicycle, and see how each component allow another component to move and how
that component drives the bicycle to move. Another way to look at the bicycle in
a bigger picture, this way of looking is to look it ecologically. To see how
the bicycle are made. To see how the making of bicycle affects another thing or
to see where each component comes from.
To see things ecologically can also be categorized
into two: shallow ecology and deep ecology. Shallow ecology is to look at the
system without concerning about human. It is the way to see the system of how
everything connects but excluding human. On the other hand, deep ecology is to
look at the system that includes human as one of the factor. Human are the one
who makes changes ecologically around the world. We interrupted the system with
the new technology we invented, which it creates a great ecological impact.
The system causes us to look at the world differently
causes our perception to be different same as palimpsest that we write on top
of it.
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Topos, Utopia, Dystopia and Heterotopia
Place and
location are not the same thing. Location refers to a particular point on the
surface of the earth, while place refers to a relationship of person to space.
Everything in this world, and that everything in the world comes from our
perception. "Topos", a Greek term for place, defines Utopia, Dystopia
and Heterotopia.
U or EU a
Greek root means "good" or "not" and “topo” means place. As
these two roots combine it creates the term "Utopia", a good place
and not a place. The concept of utopia was introduced by Sir Thomas More in his
book "Utopia" as a perfect society that has no time, no place and
totalitarian control of society. Utopia is a perfect society with social order.
The first Utopia that we know is a Garden of Eden. According to the Bible, everything
in Garden of Eden is Perfect place. There is no one fight. There is no pain. Everything
grows well. It is timeless and placeless. Until, Eve take the apple of wisdom
so Adam and Eve got expelled from the garden. The concept of Utopia is not
physical and to make this becomes physical needs interpretation. Of course,
that interpretation comes from us, human. We are the interpreter.
Because
of us interpret the Utopia idea and physicalize it, it creates another concept
of topo, which is “Heterotopia”. Heterotopia is a physical representation or
approximation of Utopia, the space of otherness. Hetero means others. So it
also refers to the parallel relation that creates the utopia thought. To look
at it in a more simple way, we look at the city as not nature because we
compare it to forest and mountain that we have a perception of it as being
nature. One example of Heterotopia is prison. Prison is the simulation of being
ordered, being punished and being restrained. To make that needs a parallel
environment so people inside feel that they are punished.
From the
picture above is a picture for prison. The hall way is free for the guard to
walk around. The guards can walk to anywhere he wants unlike the prisoners that
are restrained in the cell. The parallel relationship between freedom and
restraint defines one and another. One concept makes the understanding of
another concept becomes stronger.
From the
reading “Of Other Spaces” by Michel Foucault, Foucault gives us the example of
mirror. A place in mirror is a utopia. The reflected world is not real. The
image in it is not real. However, the mirror image can also be the heterotopia
as well because mirror is an object. We can touch.
The last
topo is Dystopia. Dystopia is the opposite idea of Utopia although it does not
exist. Dystopia is a bad place, bad society where people kill and fight to one
another, society where things are disorder. Example can be found in many
literatures, one of them is “Machine Stops” by E.M. Foster. It talks about the
future when humans rely on too much technology to live on their own until one
day when the system shuts down. That time is the time when humans need to stay
alive and have to live on their own again.
Thursday, October 31, 2013
Place
If there were a hundred
unrelated people to ask to describe their home, none of them will say the same
thing. One person might say that his home is a one-story house with gable roof
and chimney inside has his mom and his dad live in. Another person might say a
high rise apartment have the most comfortable bed living alone. For me, home is
where I live with my mom and my siblings. It is where I sing in a shower. It is
where I bake during weekend. And it is where I sleep almost everyday.
;) It is where four of us shared our happiness and depression. That is a home
for me.
When people think of home,
they think of a place they live. One house can never be a home or a place with
no memories ties them up with our perception. It will be just a space. From the
example of home, the locations of home for those people are different from one
and another. But that is not a factor why they define home differently but
because of the memory that tie to the space they live become a place for them
call home. Place is where you have interaction with. It is a social construct.
It is a connection of people, earth, sky and divine. Home is a type of dwelling
and to dwell means to isolate, to interact and to interconnect.
In class we were shown the
movie called “Powaqquatsi”. This movie has no dialog but background music. It
is a movie show about how people live in Brazil. It shows a hard lifestyle that
Brazilians have. What they have to care is not object, reputation or social
status but something that could sustain their life day by day. This is a place
called Brazil that shows in the movie. Our memory ties us to the name Brazil through the movie. The place has context, interconnection and
interaction from people to earth to sky and the divine. That make that place a
place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)